Philosophy of Emotions 10/8 Summary
So, the first half of last class we talked about possible blog topics and Dr. Gallegos highlighted the importance of really finding something puzzling and clearly articulating the puzzle that could be solved and how philosophy helps clarify the puzzle or vice versa.
We also wrapped up the Barrett readings and clarified Barrett’s view, which is, that the argument “My brain made me do it” doesn’t work for Barrett, because you are your brain. And the only time you’re not actually in control is when you feel a reflex.
Then Dr. Gallegos gave us a brief overview of terms and concepts to help us prepare to dive into the two readings. Just to refresh our memories, oppression and privilege are described as two sides of the same coin, because they are two sides of systems of inequality.
Privilege is who is advantaged relative to others and oppression is who is disadvantaged relative to others.
Oppression and privilege refer specifically to social groups and social groups are core to your identity. They’re something your thrown into and not something you can choose.
We then talked about how oppression was structural in nature and not personal. Society is structured to advantage some, even when no one is trying to do so.
Many advantaged people are unable to see oppression and privilege because they do not see themselves as oppressors or as having extra advantages and a lot of times they aren’t they just aren’t being as disadvantaged as others.
To end the class, Dr. Gallegos talked about how the effects of oppression are cumulative and compounding and the example of the birdcage and how all the wires fit together to trap the bird inside.
The wires are invisible to the privileged, and for the oppressed the experience is characterized by a two edged issue.
→ they have to attempt to cope with the situation without making people uncomfortable while also dealing with the fragility of the privileged individuals around them.
This reminds me of Madison’s blog about how Wake Forest minority students’ anger about recent happenings on campus is not working as a way to position themselves as “one up”.
Inequality has been a pervasive issue for centuries, and I think it is really important and amazing that we as students and philosophers take the time to think about analyze the structure behind it, as well as dispel any misunderstandings.
Food for thought: is it possible and if it is, how do we train ourselves to see the birdcage for others? And in acknowledging it, are we doing enough?
Shared by: LH